Showing posts with label Emma Thomson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Emma Thomson. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

Dan Rather Speaks on the 50th Anniversary of His Most Important Story


BY EMMA THOMSON

Fifty years after he broke the news that President John F. Kennedy had been killed, Dan Rather joined The Kalb Report at the National Press Club to talk about his experiences as a journalist covering the president’s assassination from Dallas. The former anchor of the CBS Evening News sat down with Marvin Kalb to give his firsthand account of the events surrounding Kennedy’s death.

His Story
On Nov. 22, 1963, CBS assigned the Texas native to coordinate media coverage for a “routine political visit”. Rather was stationed at the underpass where the president’s motorcade was scheduled to culminate when he saw what he believed to be Kennedy’s limousine speed by him.

It was not until Rather rushed to the local CBS station to complete a film drop that he heard Kennedy had been shot. The wires at the station began to run as the news broke.

“Every reporter’s emotions just kicked in,” he said.

Knowing the phone lines would soon be busy, Rather placed three calls to the hospital where Kennedy had been taken. Although a nurse hung up on him the first time he called, Rather eventually was able to speak to a doctor and a priest, who both confirmed the president indeed had been shot and was dead.

The word of doctors and a priest was enough evidence for Rather. 

“When you’ve got a dead man, you’ve got a dead man,” Rather said.

Although television broadcasts would wait until the official White House announcement to break the news to the American people, CBS immediately played the Star Spangled Banner and announced that Kennedy had been assassinated.

During the four-day ordeal, Rather relied on his journalism fundamentals to report the facts to the American people. This allowed him to calmly break the tragic news during one of the most emotional experiences of his life.

“When a sledgehammer hits your heart, your instincts kick in,” he said.  “You’re a reporter…and you’ve got a dead man.”

Rather attributes his news instincts to helping him avoid a potential disaster as he covered Kennedy’s death. When Kalb mentioned that he would have been terrified to break such immense news without official confirmation, Rather reminded him that when things are in chaos, simply reporting was more important than anything else. 

“If you had been there, you or any reporter, your instincts would have kicked in,” he said.

Kalb and Rather discussed the role of journalism in the Kennedy coverage. Both pointed out that the assassination was the beginning of the, “TV age as we knew it.” Comparing earlier work to modern journalism, Rather said past journalism had been less bias and more honest.

“[The coverage of Kennedy’s death] was the spine of American journalism,” he said. “Most journalists were honest brokers of information.”

Rather related the Kennedy assassination news reporting to the coverage of 9/11. He called the two national tragedies, “bookends of the television news era.” According to him, TV news came of age during the four day programming following the Kennedy assassination and lost headway in the digital era following 9/11.  

Conspiracy Theories
Rather is for the most part quick to dismiss potential conspiracies surrounding Kennedy’s death. He believes that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone and Jack Ruby was the person who killed Oswald.

“An assassin assassinated in the police station, you can’t make this stuff up!” Rather said.

He emphasized the necessity to analyze the Kennedy assassination with facts and not emotion.

“We’re entitled to our own opinions,” he said. “But we’re not entitled to our own facts.”

GW connection
Many members of the GW community attended Friday’s School of Media and Public Affairs (SMPA) sponsored event.

Steve Mukherjee, who earned an engineering management degree from the School of Engineering and Applied Science (SEAS) in 1979, said he was thrilled to see Rather that evening. Although Mukherjee was in a small Indian town when he heard that Kennedy had been shot, he still values the veteran journalist’s work surrounding the assassination.

Rather is, “The best there is, the best there was, and the best there ever will be,” he said. 

Other attendees included Provost Steven Lerman and SMPA Director Frank Sesno. Lerman, who was in his seventh grade gym class when he heard that Kennedy was dead, said that the opportunity to attend the Kalb Report was an educational and exciting opportunity for GW students. As a broadcast journalism veteran, Sesno emphasized the importance of television reporting during the coverage surrounding the assassination. 

Several GW students had the opportunity to ask Kalb and Rather questions following the program. Junior Omeed Firouzi asked Rather how President Lyndon Johnson was affected by the Kennedy assassination. After the event, Firouzi said he was excited to hear Rather’s “unique vantage” of the events surrounding Kennedy’s death.

“Rather lived through the events,” Firouzi said. “He is a primary source.”  

However, the man of the hour did not try to venture into the unknown. On Kennedy’s legacy and the what-ifs surrounding his administration cut short, Rather does not speculate on the “would have beens.”

“We’ll never know,” he said. “It ended too soon to judge.” 

The accomplished journalist still considers the story the biggest of his career. When he was asked which network had the best coverage of the assassination and following events, Rather replied with a sheepish grin.

“CBS,” he said. As if he had any other option. 

Friday, April 5, 2013

GW Veterans Discuss their Views on Media Coverage of War


By Emma Thomson

Wednesday evening the GW Veterans and Office of Veteran Services presented War in the Media: A Veteran’s Perspective before a diverse crowd in the Marvin Center Amphitheater. The panel, moderated by School of Media & Public Affairs Professor Michael Shanahan, discussed the role of the media in war coverage, the interactions between soldiers and reporters, the embedding process, and the transition for veterans from the Army to life at GW.

Participants in the panel included current George Washington students and Army veterans Mitchell Bent, Elena Kim, and Dominic Amaral. They were joined by national correspondent for McClatchy Newspaper Hannah Allam and foreign policy-defense analyst Andrew Lubin, both of whom participated in Iraq as embedded soldiers and have extensive experience in combat zone reporting.

The panel began with a discussion on the issue of embedding, a program in which the military places a civilian press member in a specific unit to record and report on its activity. Not surprisingly, the members of the panel all had different individual experiences with their respective reporters. Bent  described his own experience with an embedded reporter. He remembered when a journalist assigned to his unit witnessed a misfired mortar that hit a civilian’s home. Though Bent insists the incident was an accident, he recalls the journalist’s immediate response as, “Oh my God, you just mortared civilians.”

According to Bent, the reporter’s words inflicted devastating shame on the men who had fired the mortar, which had been aimed at the enemy, and made them, “wish they had never been born.” As a result of his personal experience, Bent perceives the media as an institution “not to be trusted.”

Allam passionately responded to Bent’s remarks. She protested that journalists are not in war zones to cover up soldiers’ mistakes but to report the truth.  She said they are not cheerleaders, nor are embedded press members obligated to write positive stories if nothing positive is happening.   

Some veterans want to see more graphic depictions of the war. Amaral, who encountered many embedded journalists during his service, expressed his desire for news sources to publish the gory images of the realities of war. In addition, he stated his frustration with civilians who do not understand war or who base their opinions on the war scenes from video games or movies.  Amaral supported the use of embedded journalists their use as long as they follow the ground rules set by the military and do not interfere with missions.     

Kim, who during her 5 year career served as a Human Intelligence Collector through a 15 month tour in Iraq, stressed the importance of covering not only veterans’ issues, but female veterans’ transition back into civilian life. As the only female veteran on the panel, she added a unique perspective to military themes often seen as inherently masculine. According to her, transitioning into college life was even more difficult as a female veteran due to the lack of community among other returning women soldiers.    

Before the panel began, Shanahan, a Vietnam veteran, provided a history of media-military relationships beginning with the Civil War. Mentioning Lincoln’s struggles to raise support following the publication of Matthew Brady’s photographs depicting fallen soldiers, Shanahan stressed the importance of the media in gauging public perception of war. Particularly in the Korean Conflict and Vietnam War, the media played an immense role in conveying war themes and images to the American public. Shanahan noted that the press has the ability to influence the public, and also must use the information given by the government. As an example, he remembered the misinformation given about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq that was used by both the president and the media to justify the war.     

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

SA Senate Plans Ways to Move Forward on Student Space


By Emma Thomson
The Student Association Senate discussed ways to move forward on its student space proposal at its meeting Monday night.  The Senate held the meeting on the Mount Vernon Campus in West Hall.
President Ashwin Narla responded to a letter in GWToday from Provost Steven Lerman and Treasurer Lou Katz regarding the student body’s attempt to petition the administration for more student space.  Narla expressed frustration at the administration’s previously unexpressed philosophy of decentralizing student space. 
Narla cited a “difference in philosophies” between the student body and administration in the issue of student space. He noted that GW does not have a student union unlike most of the market basket schools, a drawback that inhibits community and school spirit. The GW administration, Lerman and Katz said in their letter plans to develop individual areas of student space as it builds new infrastructure. 
Narla also vowed to continue collaboration on addressing student space with the Board of Trustees and administration for the remainder of his term as President, which ends in May.  Narla said he wants to make decisions about moving forward not based in frustration, but strategic thinking. In addition, he said there are plans to thank the student body for their support on the student space petition. Narla also encouraged Senators to increase their use of the term “Raise High” throughout campus to help foster school spirit.    
In other business, the Student Life committee reported plans to commemorate the late Senator Daniel Inouye, a GW alum, by naming a building after him; improving biking conditions throughout campus, and creating an easier website for campus philanthropy and service. The Academic Affairs committee celebrated the institution of longer hours at Eckles Library. 
Later on and after much debate, the Senate approved a bill to develop a solar charging table in Kogan Plaza. 
The Senate's next meeting is February 25th at 9pm in Marvin Center room 309. 

Monday, December 3, 2012

Students Discuss and Question GW's Strategic Plan at SA Town Hall Meeting


by Emma Thomson 

GW Provost Steven Lerman and the Student Association held a town hall meeting Thursday to discuss the new strategic plan the University has drafted and is in the process of approving. About twenty students gathered in Funger Hall to discuss the new plan, which currently is in its first draft. 
Provost Lerman opened his presentation by explaining the four themes of the strategic plan.  It is comprised of “broad brushstrokes” of actions to elevate the education experience at GW. The first objective is to unify the university and make it stronger as a whole by encouraging cross-disciplinary study. Provost Lerman stressed the importance of creating an environment where students and faculty work together.  
Next, the strategic plan serves to create more globalization prospects, acknowledging that the world is getting, “smaller and flatter” for students and faculty. For example, Provost Lerman pointed out the need for more discussion of intersecting fields such as religion and politics to create a more holistic education for students. In addition, the strategic plan will increase leadership and citizenship initiatives at the University. Not only does it focus on creating constructive student leaders and citizens but also develops the University’s own identity in the city, country, and global community. 
Finally, the strategic plan aims to expand GW’s Policy and Government programs to make them the best in the field. The goal to improve already-strong programs will allow the university to become more accomplished and respected across the globe. 
GW will implement the strategic plan through creating more affinity housing to foster leadership and communication skills, expanding the study abroad and Faculty in Residence programs, striving to keep the university affordable while maintaining quality, and updating the admissions process to allow more unification. 
Some of the discussion focused on GW’s schools with smaller capacities such as The Elliot School of International Affairs, The School of Media and Public Affairs, and The School of Public Health. Students expressed concern over the new idea to admit students to the university without regard to school or major, constraining the already-full majors. Provost Lerman said that the University would follow the SMPA admissions model, which allows students to “pre-major” in their applications. Prospective students will first be admitted to GW before admission to the specific program in such unique situations.  
Provost Lerman also addressed questions from students who attended the meeting, many of whom were wary of certain aspects of the plan including student life and financial decisions. The questions included adjunct teacher salaries, more affordable housing options, better fundraising opportunities through alumni, student involvement in Board of Trustee decisions, and the ever-present tuition and school spirit debates. 
Now in its editing stages, the strategic plan will be finalized by the end of the year and presented to the Board of Trustees at its February meeting. 

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

University Announces New Strategic Academic Plan


by Emma Thomson

Provost Steven Lerman and the Student Association hosted a town hall meeting yesterday to discuss with students the university's efforts to set a new strategic plan in effect this academic year.

The new strategic plan aims to consolidate the university from separate units into one, operating under one undergraduate admissions system. Under the new plan, applicants will apply to the university as a whole, rather than applying to specific school, such as the Elliot School or Columbian College.

This process follows the admissions model of many other prestigious universities such as Princeton, Stanford, and the University of Rochester, schools that Provost Lerman spoke about at the town hall.

The plan has been centralized around two questions: "What is the world going to look like in ten years?" and "What is GW good at?"

Provost Lerman emphasized the goal of preparing GW students for the work force, especially in an international market. In addition, Lerman stressed that the university is not wealthy, but can use its resources to improve already strong programs into world-class caliber ones. According to the provost, GW has a great advantage in its central location that connects it to institutions such as the World Bank, the Smithsonian Institution, and the State Department.

The new academic plan outlines four areas that connect the various units of the university: potential to be strong in globalization, governance and policy, innovation through cross-disciplinary studies, and citizenship and leadership. The plan seeks to connect the schools with common themes, such as the importance of policy to many GW programs. Cross-disciplinary studies can apply academic concepts to real world applications.

"Most of us are interested in how theory affects human condition," Lerman said. "Solutions to problems will not come from one discipline...but a holistic solution."

Provisions in the tentative strategic plan include calls to action regarding goals to foster interdisciplinary studies, create additional faculty positions, implement the "admit to one university" application model, build more graduate housing, create more opportunity for undergraduate research, and expand the career center.

Provost Lerman says the plan will make budget changes to increase the prosperity of already-successful academic programs, using monetary incentives to encourage schools to teach more undergraduate students. He gave the example of the university giving the law school incentives to teach undergraduates constitutional law.

A draft of the strategic plan should be ready October 1st, followed by discussion by the October 2nd faculty assembly and board of trustees meeting. How to pay for the new plan, which is expected to cost at least $100 million, is a top concern for students. Lerman said the money will come from the provost's office, the Innovation Task Force measures to consolidate university debt, and philanthropy. The plan is slated to go into effect February 2013 if approved by the board of trustees.

Many students voiced their concerns over the lack of student life measures in the strategic plan, citing desires to foster a greater sense of community and more school spirit. In addition, students asked for a stronger student voice and more involvement in administrative and board of trustees decisions.

This is the first strategic plan the school has made following the 2002 "Academic Excellence" campaign, which emphasized investments in specific parts of the university rather than the academic experiences as a whole. The previous plan selected twenty-two GW programs to receive funding. Since the program's implementation, only two investments have been discontinued. The new academic plan is meant to carry GW into its bicentennial in 2021.

For those unable to attend Tuesday's meeting, Provost Lerman announced university officials are organizing another town hall meeting in order to allow more students to participate.